Foopets | Real Virtual Pets Online

Member Login

█ Stat Totals █

Medium
Useful 92

This was originally made in August/September of 2011. This is a repost since the sticky was deleted. This was the guide that was part of the sticky.

I made this for my own use but a few people found it useful, then a handful of people made the same thing as I did, and I lost all credit for it. With the new breeding forum, I figured I would repost this here so others could use it. I have put together a list of the stat totals of all breeds on Foo. If you are one of the users who frequently need to total up some stats, this could be very useful for you. They are generally in alphabetical order, though breeds with different variations may be placed with each other.
Hope you enjoy :)

How to get stat totals/percents?

Simply just add pet’s stats together. If you want the total for the breed and not just the individual pet, add the maximum stats together and the number should match the one I have here.

Example: Chad is an 88% Ultra. To find his stat total, you must add up the individual stats that your pet was given.
In this case, I would add the following: 137 + 162 + 145 + 115 + 139 = 698

The next step would be to add the max total for the breed, which you can find at the far right.
In this case, I would add the following: 167 + 174 + 150 + 148 + 151 = 790

His individual stats were added together, leaving us with 698.
If you take the total of the pets stats(in this case, 698) and divide it by the stat total for the breed(for Golden Retrievers, the total is 790), you will get a decimal answer. Move the decimal to the right two places, and you have your percent.

698/790= 0.883……. = 88%

STAT TOTALS

The first set of numbers is the stat total for each breed. The second set is the minimum stat total that the breed needs to be an Ultra. If you add up the stats and the pet is anything less then that number, they are not an Ultra.

For example: Husky(Black) : Breed Total : Ultra Total
The breed total for a Husky is 753, and a Husky needs 603 or higher to be an Ultra.

{{Dogs}}

Australian Shepherd : 784 : 628
Beagle : 714 : 572
Boston Terrier : 722 : 578
Boxer : 710 : 569
Bulldog : 714 : 572
Chihuahua : 658 : 527
Dachshund : 730 : 584
Dalmatian : 700 : 560
German Shepherd : 834 : 668
Golden Retriever : 790 : 632
Great Dane : 702 : 562
Husky(Black) : 753 : 603
Husky(Red) : 805 : 644
Jack Russell Terrier Rough Coat : 719 : 576
Jack Russell Terrier Smooth Coat : 821 : 657
Lab(Yellow) : 731 : 585
Lab(Black) : 741 : 593
Lab(Chocolate) : 740 : 592
Lab(Marley) : 770 : 616
Mastiff : 724 : 580
Miniature Pincher : 766 : 612
Miniature Schnauzer : 716 : 572
Pit Bull : 745 : 596
Portuguese Water Dog : 660 : 528
Pug : 625 : 500
Rottweiler : 727 : 582
Shiba Inu : 727 : 582
Weimaraner : 695 : 556
Westie : 683 : 545
White Poodle Mix : 694 : 556
Yorkshire Terrier : 681 : 545

{{Cats}}

Abyssinian : 711 : 569
Bengal : 741 : 593
Bombay : 711 : 569
Calico : 721 : 577
Cream Persian : 605 : 484
Himalayan : 636 : 509
Long Haired Silver Tabby : 718 : 575
Maine Coon : 721 : 577
Mix(Tabby) : 691 : 553
Mix(Black) : 728 : 583
Mix(Tuxedo) : 698 : 559
Mix (Orange) : 713 : 571
Nebelung : 739 : 592
Norwegian Forest : 711 : 569
Russian Blue : 736 : 559
Siamese : 747 : 598
White Cat : 736 : 559

Will be edited as needed.
Feel free to post it on your profile, just please don’t go remaking it. This took me a long time to do, and I would like if it was not copied again. I hope you find this as informative as I did. Feel free to chat and add some other ideas to this if you want, just be kind to everyone. :)

Medium
Useful 4

You’re welcome! :)
I thought I would repost it since the sticky was deleted. I added in some photos this time though.. :)

Medium

boop

Medium

Boop

Medium

^

Medium

save also, do stats actually make dogs better at frisbee/ball? Do stats have any effect on how they behave? What is desirable?

Medium

TheGreekFreaks,
No, stats don’t actually make dogs better at frisbee/ball. The stats don’t have any effect on how they behave.

Medium

Oh :/ that’s a shame. And misleading…